bestiality and it is allowed or not on these boards?

I know in most countries bestiality is illegal, but here in the US.. and Finland..
bestiality is legal (or at least not expressly outlawed) in these U.S. states:

Alaska
Arizona
Colorado
Connecticut
Florida
Hawaii
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Missouri
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
Ohio
Oregon
South Dakota
Texas
Vermont
Washington
West Virgina

A lot of these states used to have sodomy laws,where most of the Zoophillia stuff resided, but in the last 20 or so years they have been slowly been repealed thanks to the gay movement.

The only federal law prohibiting zoophilic pornography, is 18 U.S.C. 2256, which prohibits distribution in interstate commerce and on federal property of child pornography of a minor under 18 years old engaging in "sexually explicit conduct" of bestiality.

and to my knowledge no state prohibits the ownership or distribution of zoophile material, just the act.

So whats the verdict?

From when I started exploring bdsm I have always liked mind fuck and strict twisted Dom's and sadists. So few months ago I have met one on chat site and we started to play. It was fast falling down into ownership, fast moving on to another platform. Usually on that site when people play they only share half face pics and videos, but he kept on calling me and showed me his face, soon I have shown mine as well. We played and talked every day for a month. I got addicted to his voice and smile. Then he started on saying that and taking away hearing and seeing him. We took a break but he stayed in touch, at times being teasing and at times being rude if he notice I miss him. After a month he came back, with just giving a little bit, one voice message one pic of his hand, wanting something more casual, as to just be his fuck toy but then again he would come and we would just talk. Tormenting me without orgasm. And few days after we started again, and I accepted this wicked deal. He came to tell me that he doesn't know what he wants and that I should find someone to give me all I want and when I said I liked how things flow with him and that it gave taste of whole new world oppening. He told me " what a dream or a nightmare" and not to wait on him. It made me remember he once said how he love to keep me in dark and not complete. He also said he will delete contact we had but he didn't.. it makes me wonder should I be expecting him to be back or this will end up to be just torment until I really move on..

For her safety her parents paid for a limousine to drive her and her friends around for her birthday. After dropping off the others the driver, who the girls had developed a friendship with, said he wanted to give her something for her big day. Her happiness turned to terror as he got in the back seat with her and pounded every hole, recording the entire experience as black mail. Ensuring her silence and his ownership of her going forward. 

I think all sissies should be given to male ownership

I do believe America needs to relearn these words.
http://dictionary.reference.com

Democracy:
noun, plural de�moc�ra�cies.
1. government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system.
2. a state having such a form of government: The United States and Canada are democracies.
3. a state of society characterized by formal equality of rights and privileges.
4. political or social equality; democratic spirit.
5. the common people of a community as distinguished from any privileged class; the common people with respect to their political power.

Socialism
noun
1. a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole.
2. procedure or practice in accordance with this theory.
3. (in Marxist theory) the stage following capitalism in the transition of a society to communism, characterized by the imperfect implementation of collectivist principles.

Communism
noun
1. a theory or system of social organization based on the holding of all property in common, actual ownership being ascribed to the community as a whole or to the state.
2. ( often initial capital letter ) a system of social organization in which all economic and social activity is controlled by a totalitarian state dominated by a single and self-perpetuating political party.
3. ( initial capital letter ) the principles and practices of the Communist party.
4. communalism.

Fascism
noun
1. ( sometimes initial capital letter ) a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often racism.
2. ( sometimes initial capital letter ) the philosophy, principles, or methods of fascism.
3. ( initial capital letter ) a fascist movement, especially the one established by Mussolini in Italy 1922�43.

Learn anything yet? Like how social equality (Health care for all, gay mariage) is democracy?
Wisdom overcomes all ignorance if people learn it. Educate yourself, TYT and RT america on youtube.

Bull taking ownership

Every hoe I know that's cheated on her man with me
"Yeah I fucked him" or "yeah I sucked him".

No bitch I've ever known
" Yeah I took it up the ass"

You want to make sure she never tells a soul? Not her friends, not her man, not even a priest...fuck her in the ass! She won't tell for fear that incident comes to light. In her head if her man confronts you about cheating then all her friends find out she got butt fucked. And there goes what little respect she had.

When you feel her asshole tight around your cock, that's the feeling of ownership. You may as well sign her ass cheek with a marker because you own that ass. Not enough booze in the world to get her to admit that one.

So somewhat recently my girlfriend of a decade has come out and told me that she wants me to abuse her. She's always been a good little slut but this is completely different. For reference shes ~5'5 Asian/White, barely 105 lbs, with the cutest little tits that fit perfectly in your hand and allow so that she never has to wear a bra. She loves dick with a passion in all 3 holes and I have never been disappointed.

As of recently though, when shes feeling in the mood for dick, she essentially gets to the point where she's begging me to beat her as hard as I can anywhere on her body. It's incredibly fucking hot and I just sit there smiling, punching her and hitting her with hard objects in her stomach, tits, legs, etc. She also loves getting tossed on the floor and kicked like the worthless trash she is. The best part is when she cums hard as fuck just because I'm beating her. She's not touching herself or receiving any obvious sexual stimulation, she literally cums to the intense feeling of pain and abuse and ownership that envelops her during her beatings. It's beautiful.

What I'm wondering is....

Mitt Romney's repeated claim that he played no part in executive decision-making related to Bain after 1999 is false, according to Romney's own testimony in June 2002, in which he admitted to sitting on the board of the Lifelike Co., a doll maker that was a Bain investment during the period.

Romney has consistently insisted that he was too busy organizing the 2002 Winter Olympics to take part in Bain business between 1999 and that event. But in the testimony, which was provided to The Huffington Post, Romney noted that he regularly traveled back to Massachusetts. "[T]here were a number of social trips and business trips that brought me back to Massachusetts, board meetings, Thanksgiving and so forth," he said.

Romney's sworn testimony was given as part of a hearing to determine whether he had sufficient residency status in Massachusetts to run for governor.

Romney testified that he "remained on the board of the Staples Corporation and Marriott International, the Life Like Corporation" at the time.

Yet in the Aug. 12, 2011, federal disclosure form filed as part of his p********ial bid, he said, "Mr. Romney retired from Bain Capital on February 11, 1999 to head the Salt Lake Organizing Committee. Since February 11, 1999, Mr. Romney has not had any active role with any Bain Capital entity and has not been involved in the operations of any Bain Capital entity in any way."

Bain, a private equity firm, held a stake in the Lifelike Co. until the end of 2001, including during the period in which Romney claimed to have no business involvement with Bain entities. Bain had heavily invested in Lifelike, a company that Romney identified personally as an opportunity, in 1996 and sold its shares in late 2001. His involvement with Lifelike contradicts his assertion that he had no involvement with Bain business. His testimony is supported by his 2001 Massachusetts State Ethics Commission filing, in which he lists himself as a member of Lifelike's board.

Romney has long said that he took a leave of absence from Bain because the work of organizing the 2002 Winter Olympics was so grueling, which has allowed him to deny responsibility for Bain activities during 1999 and 2002.


His activities during that period also included Staples board meetings: "I returned for most of those meetings. Others I attended by telephone if I could not return."

Bain was involved with Staples early in its life, taking the company public in 1989. Romney used his Bain position to obtain a seat on the board, which he held into 2002. He regularly cites the jobs that Staples created as reflecting positively on Bain's record.

The Boston Globe on Thursday blew a giant hole in Romney's claim that he left the private equity firm in 1999. The Globe reported that Bain's own filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission suggest that Romney remained deeply tied to the company until sometime in 2002.

Bain described Romney in 2001 SEC filings as the "sole stockholder, chairman of the board, chief executive officer, and p********." Another form stated that he owned 100 percent of the company in 2002 and received a six-figure salary from Bain in 2001 and 2002. His listed title: "Executive."

Earlier reporting on the topic by Talking Points Memo and Mother Jones had already begun to chip away at the Romney narrative.

The Romney campaign is still sticking with its candidate's story.

"The article is not accurate," spokeswoman Andrea Saul said in a statement released to reporters following the Globe story. "As Bain Capital has said, as Governor Romney has said, and as has been confirmed by independent fact checker multiple times, Governor Romney left Bain Capital in February of 1999 to run the Olympics and had no input on investments or management of companies after that point."

Yet Romney's sworn testimony appears to back up the SEC filings and contradict his personal disclosure forms submitted to Massachusetts officials in 2002, in which he said that he retired from Bain on Feb. 11, 1999.

Romney's lawyer at the Massachusetts hearing said that Romney's work in the private sector continued "unabated" while he ran the Olympics: "He succeeded in that three-year period in restoring confidence in the Olympic Games, closing that disastrous deficit and staging one of the most successful Olympic Games ever to occur on U.S. soil. Now while all that was going on, very much in the public eye, what happened to his private and public ties to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts? And the answer is they continued unabated just as they had."

Instead of leaving in 1999, Romney suggested in his testimony that he only left Bain after the Olympics in 2002: �I left on the basis of a leave of absence indicating that I, by virtue of that title, would return at the end of the Olympics to my employment at Bain Capital, but subsequently decided not to do so and entered into a departure agreement with my former partners. I use that in the colloquial sense, not legal sense, but my former partners."

The opening statement delivered by Romney's lawyer in the 2002 hearing said Romney "continued to serve on the board of directors of a significant Massachusetts company and to return here for most of its board meetings."

In a statement released Thursday, Bain defended Romney. "Mitt Romney left Bain Capital in February 1999 to run the Olympics and has had absolutely no involvement with the management or investment activities of the firm or with any of its portfolio companies since the day of his departure," the statement reads. "Due to the sudden nature of Mr. Romney's departure, he remained the sole stockholder for a time while formal ownership was being documented and transferred to the group of partners who took over management of the firm in 1999. Accordingly, Mr. Romney was reported in various capacities on SEC filings during this period."

As it stands right now,,we hope to plan something for the month of June and/or July, either at Laura's, CVE, or Annabelle's in North Carolina . Let us know more about those theaters and bookstores around these areas. Are there gloryholes, are couples allow to set in any area or do they have to set in a couples area within the theaters? Is it dark enough to have some kind of privacy and is there areas that better allow for "SAFETY"? Please stay in touch. We'll keep you informed as to a date and time.

We (couple) have plans to go experience a theater and/or Adult Bookstore video booth GH in the near future. But, need to know a little more information about theaters and/or adult bookstore with GHs booth in the North Carolina area. Preferably some where between Gastonia and Charlton.
1. Which place is the most couple, female friendly??
Hours of operation?
Cost?
2. What kind of atmosphere can we expect to see?
Is it clean?
Is there seating in the booths? Is it comfortable seats?
Is it a friendly place, both ownership, management, and
clientele?
3. Is there a theater, video booths, both single and group?
Do they have glory holes?
4. When is the best day, time to see the most clientele
there?
5. Are there other couples, females, straight males there?
6. Has it ever been busted by the law? If so, how often?
This and other questions will needed to be answer "IF" there is
enough interest within this group, as well as, activity. !

The reason for asking all these questions at once, is to know and understand the type of business we'd be walking into and what to expect. We prefer to travel out of state for discretionary reasons. Having as much information about a adult theater and/or bookstore would help save on gas and/or wasted time.
The number one priority is the comfort of the seating. Due to lower back problems. Hardwood, plastic, or metal seating would be out of the question.
Knowing the type of regular clientele to expect, is helpful as well. We prefer that if and when anything happens (sexually) we can expect a little control. We couldn't handle anything like a rough gang-bang. We prefer a one or maybe two at any one time.
Knowing first hand if the business is under the watchful eye of the law is a must. We can't think of anything worst to ruin a evening. LOL

The reason we enjoy theater and gloryhole, is the real spontaneous meetings. If you old-set up your meetings,,what's the point? Your looking at the newest form of swinging. Maybe not new to a few, but it's growing in popularity. It's spontaneous, cheap, doesn't require an invite and you don't have to be part of a little inter circle that seems to be the norm at clubs which requires you to attend on a regular bases. These economical times, don't always leave us with the ability to old-plan. WE STILL STRESS THE USE OF CONDOMS WHEN ENGAGING IN SEX AT THESE ESTABLISHMENTS!

Information may get you a personal invite.

Depraved though of the day: How much fun would it be to find a Muslim woman to own sexually (possibly behind her husband's back) and over time degrade her moral values and tempting her away for everything she grew up believing with my American cock and Western culture untill the day she fully acknowledges my ownership and leaves the only life/religion behind for me...